🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is sparking debate internationally. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and families are observing closely to see if this tactic will become a template for countries abroad.

Across Europe Movement

In Europe, a growing number of countries are exploring similar measures.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that mobile devices and apps are "stealing our youngsters' youth". The policy is expected to be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to shield the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is developing a online verification tool to verify the user details of social media participants. The media minister have suggested that an similar ban is "one of the measures on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the president has asked parliament to enact a bill lifting the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a similar move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The government in the Netherlands has urged parents to prevent their youngsters from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has approved a non-binding motion supporting a ban for minors except if guardian approval is provided. Although it highlights of the "habit-forming" quality of these platforms, the step does not create enforceable legislation.

"An effective age limit is a useful starting point," commented the parliamentarian driving the measure.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Eye

Across Britain, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "nothing is off the table" but stressing any decision must be "grounded in robust evidence".

Last year, momentum gathered behind a proposal to introduce limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually watered down. However, the administration committed to investigate the matter.

Advocacy groups have expressed concerns. One foundation set up by the loved ones of a young person who died after encountering harmful social media material argues that a blanket age ban might not improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of risk when young people reach the legal age.

"This ban is a response to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to design tools that are appropriate and suitable for minors," commented a influential child protection advocate.

America: A Decentralized Picture

In the United States, regulation is mostly happening at the state government level amid national inaction.

• Utah requires guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a law banning children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a rule restricting minors to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with additional use requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly introduced measures demanding guardian approval for minors to set up social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from some individuals to copy the Australian path, a US-wide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Views

Beyond the West, additional nations are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for Instagram to 16.

But, global bodies adopt a more cautious stance. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "may even backfire". The body notes that online platforms can be a "critical link" for vulnerable children and that bans should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to improve child safeguards.

Even as this global debate unfolds, the actions of the Australian government and others show that policymakers internationally are less and less willing to delay for tech companies to self-regulate.